To print this page properly - use Print icon located on the page.
Please note that JavaScript has to be enabled.
  

In the News

  • 29-Apr-10 10:05 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Click here for full article.

    Live Mint and The Wall Street Journal.

    New Delhi: What was initially planned as an investment corridor along the proposed Dedicated Freight Corridor (DFC) between Delhi and Mumbai may give India its first world-class, self-sustainable smart cities if plans by the Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor Development Corp. Ltd (DMICDC) are implemented.

    The DFC between Delhi and Mumbai, covering an overall length of 1,483km and passing through six states—Uttar Pradesh, Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan, Gujarat and Maharashtra—will have end terminals at Dadri in the National Capital Region and Jawaharlal Nehru Port near Mumbai.

    The feasibility studies for the first three “smart cities” are set to be commissioned through Japanese consultants in the current year. The first phase of urbanization in these cities is targeted to be completed by 2017-18, said Amitabh Kant, chief executive and managing director of DMICDC.

    “When initially we thought about DMIC, we did not think of building new cities, but later we realized without world-class cities, no industrial hub can thrive,” Kant said.

    “DMICDC provides India a unique opportunity to adopt futuristic smart city concept of minimal pollution, maximum recycling and reuse of finite resources, optimization of energy supplies and consumption-efficient use of public transportation in its new cities,” a prepared press statement read.

    Towards building these new global cities, DMICDC and the state governments of Haryana, Gujarat and Maharashtra, and Japanese consultants will sign a memorandum of understanding (MoU) for pilot projects in areas such as the Manesar-Bawal region (Haryana), the Sendra industrial region (Maharashtra), and Dahej and Changodar (Gujarat).

    The MoU will be signed on Friday in the presence of commerce minister Anand Sharma and Masayuki Naoshima, Japanese minister for economy, trade and industry.

    Japanese companies such as Toshiba Corp., Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd, Mitsubishi Corp. and Hitachi Ltd will experiment with smart technologies in the areas of logistics, water treatment and urban transport before they are implemented along the industrial corridor.

    When asked whether land acquisition will be a problem, Kant said: “We are working on a unique model of community partnership where landholders will be made partners in the process of development.”

    The first set of such cities may come up in Gujarat and Maharashtra. A proposed city at Dholera in Gujarat is planned to attract a resident population of about two million and provide employment to more than 0.8 million people. More than 20% of the area will be under green belts, Kant said.

    The total cost of the projects is calculated at Rs55,225 crore at current prices. The other two cities that may come up are in the Nasik-Sinner-Igatpuri investment region and the Dighi port industrial area in Maharashtra. The projected population at Dighi port is 1.75 million by 2042 with a total land requirement of 23,000 hectares. The Pitampur-Dhar-Mhow investment region in Madhya Pradesh will be built up in a delineated area of 372 sq. km.

    The proposed industrial corridor is being developed in collaboration with the government of Japan as global manufacturing and trading hubs.

    The regions will have road and rail connectivity for freight movement to and from ports and logistics hubs, apart from domestic and international air connectivity, reliable power, quality social infrastructure, and will provide a globally competitive environment conducive for setting up businesses.

    “Around 80% of these cities will be developed through the public-private partnership model while the government has to build the basic infrastructure,” Kant said.

    During the visit of Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama to India in December, an MoU was signed between DMICDC and Japan External Trade Organization to develop “smart communities” or eco-cities in India.

    Japan has been the front-runner in introducing sustainability concepts through various innovative planning and implementation models that incorporate industrial ecology, waste water, renewable energy, among others. “Kitakyushu eco-town” in Japan is one such example.

    asit.m@livemint.com


  • 20-Apr-10 09:55 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Click here for full article.

    The Washington Post
    By Nina Shen Rastogi
    Tuesday, April 20, 2010

    Lantern, I too have lain awake at night wondering whether dry-erase pens were better for the environment than blackboard chalk. But in honor of Earth Day, maybe you can get past the Green Lantern's this-vs.-that coverage of consumer products and offer some bigger-picture advice? Overall, what are the most important things for individual consumers to focus on?

    It's true, you're not going to save the planet by choosing "pleather" jackets over leather ones, beer over wine, or MP3s over CDs. But each time we stage one of these cage matches, we're forced to consider just how complicated the idea of "eco-friendliness" can be. It doesn't just come down to greenhouse gas emissions or energy usage, though those are the two metrics people seem most interested in these days.

    A complete analysis would also weigh the potential effects of each choice on water pollution, land use and biodiversity, among many other issues. Plus, studying life-cycle analyses -- no matter what answers they ultimately provide or how trivial the initial question -- reminds us that the products we buy tend to have intricate back stories.

    Still, the Lantern is glad for the reminder to try to see the (rapidly diminishing) forest for the (carbon-sequestering) trees. She'll happily direct your attention to the most recent issue of the Journal of Industrial Ecology, which is devoted to the topic of sustainable consumption and production. In an introductory article, the issue's four co-editors lay out some of the key findings from the last several decades of research.

    The main point is that, when it comes to the environmental impacts of individual households, four areas dominate: transportation, diet, housing construction (i.e., the impacts of manufacturing, transporting and assembling building materials) and energy-using products (which include appliances, lighting fixtures, and heating and cooling units). In industrialized countries, these categories collectively account for 70 to 80 percent of a household's environmental impacts.

    The editors also describe several variables that are likely to determine whether your environmental footprint is going to be heavier than your neighbor's -- or your cousin's on the other side of the country. For example, urban living is generally greener than the suburban or rural variety, thanks to higher building densities, lower heating and cooling requirements, and less need for a car. Similarly, an increase in the number of people living in one home means decreased impacts per person. (Congratulations, recent college grads living six to an apartment: Your penury is a net gain for the planet.) Research has also shown that impacts tend to rise with household income. (Congratulations again, recent grads!)

    The Industrial Ecology report is mostly concerned with the policy implications of these findings, so the Lantern asked the issue's editors what advice they'd offer individual consumers. Arnold Tukker of the Dutch research organization TNO laid out these top recommendations: Insulate your home, choose energy-efficient appliances, drive a fuel-efficient car (if you must drive at all), moderate your meat and dairy consumption, eat what's in season and avoid food that's been air-shipped.

    But let's step back even further and consider another kind of big picture. Individual actions -- no matter what kind of savings they produce -- can't really be evaluated in isolation. To be environmentally meaningful, they need to be considered as part of a larger, holistic set of behaviors. For example, if you buy a fuel-efficient hybrid and then proceed to drive it twice as often, you've squandered your savings. (That's what's known in environmental circles as "the rebound effect.") Likewise, if you scrupulously buy nontoxic cleaners and 100 percent recycled toilet paper but fly once a month for work, you're really not doing Earth any favors.

    Sustainable consumption isn't just about buying greener products; it's also about changing the way we think about consumption in the first place. As Tukker's co-editor, Maurie Cohen of the New Jersey Institute of Technology, noted, we won't save the planet by consuming differently: We need to learn how to consume less. That's a hard truth to swallow in this age of lazy environmentalism. But what better time to contemplate it than Earth Day?

    Is there an environmental quandary that's been keeping you up at night? Send it to ask.the.lantern@gmail.com. Read previous Green Lantern columns here.


  • 29-Mar-10 16:39 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    For original article click here.

    Just walking outside for a few minutes gave one a dirty face and the sky seemed always to be covered with an enormous gray cloud. That's the memory Zhang Guangquan has of Tianjin three years ago.

    "Nowadays, the air is much better. We can see the blue sky," Zhang said last Monday.

    Today trucks transporting coal for electricity are banned from passing through downtown and some high polluting businesses like the Tianjin Soda Plant, the second largest soda manufacturer of its kind in China, have been ordered to relocate to suburban industrial parks. These were other signs of environmental progress that another Tianjin resident, taxi driver Chen Jingcai noted.

    Tianjin, the third largest city in China, is one of northern China's leading industrial cities. Located about 137 kilometers southeast of Beijing, the city with a population of over 10 million is a rail, road, air and shipping hub. Dominated by heavy industry, the biggest port city in northern China was once known as "foggy city."

    In response to a national call for environmental protection, the Tianjin Municipal Government invested 24 billion yuan ($3.51 billion) from 2007 to 2008 with over 14 billion yuan ($2.05 billion) going to eco-friendly infrastructure construction.

    In 2008 16 billion yuan ($2.3 billion) was spent on environmental protection, accounting for 2.5 percent of Tianjin's GDP, or over 635 billion yuan ($92,99 billion). Figures for 2009 were not yet available, said the Tianjin Environmental Protection Bureau.

    An initial estimate by the National Bureau of Statistics said the per unit GDP energy consumption of Tianjin in 2009 was 0.836 tons of standard coal, down 6.03 percent over the same period last year.

    Great efforts have been made in terms of financial input and technology development, said Yang Zhenjiang from the development and reform committee of the Binhai New Area of Tianjin.

    But more work is expected to lure low polluting businesses such as software development and manufacturing and in reducing emissions for older enterprises, said Song Yuyan from environmental protection department of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA).

    Turning garbage into gold

    One glimmer of green hope is the plan by the TEDA to begin using a form of total recycling called industrial symbiosis (IS), which is a fresh concept to many producers in China.

    IS can help reduce waste, energy consumption and operational costs by recycling raw materials, byproducts, energy, transportation, or storage space among producers no matter if they are in the same business or different ones.

    Through IS, by-products of one company can be raw materials for another; utilities or infrastructures of several businesses can be shared and a joint provision of services such as fire protection, transportation, and food provisions can be enjoyed.

    In Europe and Japan, the mode has proved successful and the Tianjin local government decided last year to try to adapt it for local businesses.

    The four-year program, launched last week in TEDA, is expected to save 50 million yuan ($7.32 million), reduce 3,000 tons of hazardous waste, and 99,000 tons of CO2 emissions, according to its boosters.

    It is also expected to bring additional private investment in reprocessing and sales for industry to those businesses involved.

    But the question is, can foreign shoes fit Tianjin's feet?

    No pressure to go green

    In fact, many local enterprises have shown little interest in the program, said Zhang Jun from Environmental Protection Association of TEDA.

    "No law says they should cooperate," Zhang said.

    "The charge for waste treatment is low and we don't have a waste landfill tax in China," said Song Yuyan, who is also in charge of the IS project in Tianjin.

    It costs one company only 20 to 30 yuan ($3-$4.40) per ton of wastes to dump it in a Tianjin landfill, while in many Western countries increasingly high taxes are charged for using landfill centers in an attempt to encourage more sustainable ways of managing wastes.

    Another challenge is formulating standards for CO2 emission reductions, something China hasn't done because it is still designing the criteria, said Song.

    Low polluters will be frustrated if they are asked to meet the same target as those high polluters, Song added.

    It is also a challenge in management to build a platform, which needs to track the flow of wastes and resources of over 4,000 enterprises in industrial parks of Tianjin, noted Paul Knuckle from International Synergies, a UK-based company that helps devel-op and deliver industrial ecology based solutions for industry worldwide.

     

    More efforts needed

    It is self-evident that no city can afford environment pollution and exhaustion of natural resources.

    "We can't copy workable modes of European countries, but we at least can borrow something from fruitful cases," said Zhang of TEDA.

    Reports and statistics about how much operational costs European companies have saved can be presented to local businesses to help them see that instead of paying to dispose of garbage they can get money from it.

    Building up a green-oriented production mode takes time and a lot of convincing work needs to be done and repeated, Zhang said.

    And the local government is considering offering financial allowances to those businesses willing to join in the program and interact with other businesses to keep a low-cost economic development.

    "Once Tianjin can figure out a mode workable, other cities in China may follow suit," Zhang said.

    The editor of Business desk welcomes story ideas, comments or suggestions for this page. E-mail: business@globaltimes.com.cn




  • 23-Mar-10 16:49 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    For original article, click here.

    International Synergies selected as 'sophisticated dating agency' to help share UK's experience of improving energy efficiency and waste reduction

    A British company was recruited today into a pioneering role in China's efforts to clean up and decarbonise its economy.

    International Synergies, a Birmingham-based firm, has been asked to share the UK's experience of improving energy efficiency and reducing waste with one of the biggest industrial powerhouses in China.

    Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area, a zone in north-eastern China with a GDP of about £30bn pounds a year, aims to reinvent itself as the Silicon Valley of low-carbon technology.

    But first it must deal with the legacy of dirty and inefficient smoke-stack industry and low-cost manufacturing.

    To reduce emissions and waste, Tianjin has teamed up with the European Union to fund one of China's first "industrial symbiosis" programmes.

    In the initial four-year stage, it aims to bring 800 companies together, reduce 365,000 tonnes of landfill waste and 99,000 tonnes of carbon emissions.

    Though relatively small in scale, the organisers hope powerful backing from Tianjin and the EU will enable the programme to be replicated on a national scale.

    The programme aims to find efficiency gains between companies. By identifying and sharing needs, the waste of one firm can become the fuel or recycled raw materials of another. Chimney steam can be diverted to heat greenhouses. Unused meat and bone from cattle rendering can be burned as fuel for cement production.

    "It's like a sophisticated dating agency," said Peter Laybourn, the head of International Synergies. "We bring companies together that would not normally be introduced to one another."

    Since 2002, he said, the National Industrial Symbiosis Programme that he helped to start in the UK has reduced 30m tonnes of carbon dioxide, trimmed landfill waste by 35m tonnes and created 8,770 jobs.

    "If we can achieve that in the UK, think what fantastic potential there is in China," he told a packed audience in Tianjin.

    China has long been criticised for using a great deal of energy and raw materials for a relatively small economic gain, though this is largely because it is a late developing economy that produces many of the world's most polluting and energy-intensive goods.

    "There is still a big gap in industrial efficiency between China and developed countries," said Zhang Jun, the deputy chair of the Tianjin Area.

    As the EU and other partners unveiled a new low carbon centre in Tianjin, he said it was in the region's interests to adopt and adapt know-how from overseas.

    "This is important for our image, for our competitiveness," he said. "If we do this well, we can develop and nurture a low-carbon industry with implications for the world."

    Not everyone is happy about this. In an echo of cold war fears of the space race, US politicians and commentators have recently expressed concerns that China may take the lead in low-carbon technology and dominate the future of the power industry.

    But representatives from the EU, which provided 80% of the funding for the Tianjin project, said China's rapid transition to a low carbon economy was in the world's interest.

    "This is the new industrial revolution," said Johan Cauwenbergh, minister counsellor of the EU. "The transition to a low carbon economy won't be easy, but the longer we postpone taking the necessary steps, the more it will hurt later."

    The representative of the United Nations expressed hope that the new project will produce verifiable results that can convince the outside world of the potential for change.

    "The world is in desperate need of successful models to reduce carbon emissions," said Edward Clarence-Smith of the UN Industrial Development Organisation. "We hope this project can be replicated throughout China and to other developing countries."

    The political subtext of the programme is an attempt to convince China – the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter – that it can benefit from efficiency improvements and the promotion of clean technology.

    "We very strongly want to get across the message that there is no contradiction between economic growth and low-carbon development," said Alistair Morgan, commercial counsellor of the British Embassy. "We hope more regions in China will implement the industrial symbiosis model and enjoy the major benefits of sustainable development."


  • 07-Jan-10 09:38 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Original Article here.

    Clarkson University students are helping the Development Authority of the North Country choose between growing tomatoes or harvesting algae with heat from the methane gas-to-energy generators at the solid waste management facility.

    Eight undergraduate and masters students in an industrial ecology class during the fall evaluated the viability of using the waste heat to grow tomatoes and algae.

    "We try at Clarkson to give students real engineering projects, even as undergraduates, and expect they can do it and work through the real constraints," said Susan E. Powers, a professor in the civil and environmental engineering department who taught the class.

    The facility at the landfill in Rodman has three generators that produce 4.8 megawatts of electricity. When a fourth is added, the site will produce 6.4 megawatts of electricity with a byproduct of 23.84 million British thermal units of waste heat energy per hour.

    "It was a very preliminary analysis, but both options, from an engineering standpoint, appear to be economically viable," she said.

    Algae growth has the advantages of using the heat year-round and having a ready market for the end product, biodiesel production. A tomato greenhouse would only use the waste heat during winter and it would be harder to find an end market.

    The students presented their findings to DANC staff on Dec. 1. Creating a business plan, engineering and laboratory pilot facilities would be the next step in the research process, Ms. Powers said. The next step is finding sources to fund those studies.

    DANC Chief Executive Officer James W. Wright said those could be a combination of the authority's budget and outside sources.

    The two entities joined forces on the project through Carrie A. Tuttle, engineer for DANC and environmental studies masters student at Clarkson.

    "This is the first of what I hope will be many examples of the authority working with educational resources in the region," Mr. Wright said. "It brings greater opportunities for the region and fits into our overarching economic development mission."

    DANC is pursuing ways to help with workforce development in the region, he said.

    "There are a number of activities where the educational resources of the region have advantages that not only the authority, but other organizations, can utilize," Mr. Wright said.

    DANC has sought ways to use the waste heat since before the three generators went online in late 2008.

    "DANC is to be commended for its commitment to furthering its sustainability efforts," Clarkson President Anthony G. Collins said in a press release.

    "Clarkson is excited to have the opportunity to work with this state-of-the-art facility, which shows how sustainability can complement economic development in the north country."
  • 30-Dec-09 09:50 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Original Article Here.

    It takes 8 pints of water on average to make one pint of beer. That's just one reason why brewing is an carbon-intensive process. But the mid-sized Suffolk brewery Adnams is trying to make its own operations less energy guzzling in the next year. Along with nearly 2,000 other businesses and over 50,000 individuals it has joined the 10:10 climate change campaign, which involves people and organisations pledging to cut their carbon emissions by 10% in 2010.

    Adnams has already made headway. The water footprint of its beer is now down to 3.2 pints and it has made efforts to cut its carbon emissions, with innovations such as a warehouse that stores beer at an optimum temperature of about 11C without the need for heating or refrigeration and energy efficient equipment that recycles 90% of the heat used in the beer-making process. Adnams has reduced the energy used to produce each barrel of beer from 51.4kWh in 2007 to 46.3kWh in 2008. Total carbon emissions for the business in 2008 were 4,000 tonnes.

    The company expects increases in energy prices and "polluter-pays" policies, which is driving it to "green" the business and its products – such as its carbon-neutral East Green beer.

    It is planning an "industrial ecology" project which will use waste products from the brewing process, such as spent grain, to produce methane that could in turn produce electricity. From next year the brewer will also work with MBA students at the University of East Anglia, who will help monitor its emissions so that the company can report carbon emissions alongside its financial results.

    "We are proud of our carbon reduction effort throughout the past few years at Adnams," says the managing director, Andy Wood. "But we are certainly not resting on our laurels."

    Key target area for reductions in 2010

    Adnams says it has some work to do in its hotels and Cellar & Kitchen stores. The next big challenge will then be to improve the energy efficiency of its pubs.

    Area of most concern

    Water is a key area. It takes 3.2 pints of water to make every pint of Adnams beer – this is better than the industry average of 8, but the company plans to reduce it further.
    Lee has a simple immediate solution: use less packaging overall.

  • 21-Dec-09 09:40 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Original Article Here.

    (CNN) -- As world leaders and their delegates trod the carpet thin at the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen last week, one environmental solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions was literally under their feet.

    The 215,000-square-feet carpet at the Bella Center that hosted most of the U.N.'s official events was made using Ingeo, a bio-fibre derived from corn sugars.

    According to French manufacturer Sommer Needlepunch and Natureworks LLC, the provider of Ingeo, in shunning oil-based products the carpet saved the emissions equivalent of driving an average car 68,869 miles (110,834 kilometers).

    It is one small step in a bioplastics and biofibers industry that is fast developing new alternatives to oil-based polymers and turning them into everything from food packaging to fashion outfits, cell phone casings and medical implants that dissolve inside the body.

    Bioplastics are not new.

    Henry Ford theatrically swung an ax to show the dent resistance of soy-based car doors at Ford in 1940, when the infant science was called "chemurgy."

    So far, bioplastics only comprise an estimated 0.20 percent to 0.25 percent of total plastics use. But several forecasts predict a boom for the once-brittle plastics that are now beginning to compete with traditional PET and polystyrene.

    A recent University of Utrecht study forecast that up to 90 percent of plastics could technically become bio-based in the long term and that production could grow by on average 37 percent annually until 2013.

    Ceresana Research predicts the largest growth rates in electronics and auto industries. The Freedonia Group, an industrial research company, sees demand growing fastest in the Asia-Pacific region, and some predict the U.S. market to reach $10 billion a year by 2020, a tenfold increase from 2007.

    The most recent scientific breakthrough came from researchers at South Korea's pioneering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST).

    They used a metabolically engineered strain of E. Coli bacteria to produce bioplastic polymers through single-stage fermentation, potentially cutting the cost of the usually expensive process by about 40 percent when the new science is market ready within about two years, according to Professor Sangyup Lee, who led the team of scientists.

    "We're basically torturing E.Coli but in a way that will benefit human beings and environments," Lee told CNN.com.

    Such achievements take time, Lee said, estimating that the latest advance took the equivalent of 10 people working for five years. But metabolic engineering has created new pathways that allow the science to be broadly used.

    "We produce buildings blocks for the existing chemical industries so they don't get frustrated," Lee said.

    Restricted by the flow of oil

    The bioplastics market has swayed to the price of oil.

    "The general rule of thumb, if oil gets above $70-$80 a barrel, it gets very easy to compete on a price basis," said Steve Davies, director of Communications and Public Affairs at Natureworks, which owns the world's largest bioplastics facility.

    U.S. company Metabolix recently launched a plant in Iowa to produce more than 50,000 tons per year of its new niche biopolymer Mirel, in a joint venture with agribusiness giant Archer Daniels Midland. It is pricing Mirel at a premium fit for a game-changer, Dr. Oliver Peoples, Metabolix chief scientific officer and vice president of research, told CNN.

    "There's been a lot of overpromising and underdelivering," Peoples said.

    "The reality is that anyone who tells you we're going to make this bioplastic for 30 cents per pound based on fermentation technology or cellular sugars is, basically, completely conning you. We're not betting that petroleum will be $200 barrel."

    The menu of ingredients in the biomass used to make the plastics is growing -- corn, wheat, potatoes, tapioca, soy, sugarcane and wood are in the production cycle.

    Metabolix is exploring switchgrass, industrial oil seed and has been trialing tobacco crops. Algae is favored for its high yield and oil giant Exxon Mobil this year bought into its potential to produce 2,000 gallons of fuel per acre. That's almost 10 times as much as corn, which remains the cheapest and most widely used feedstock for biomass.

    Both Natureworks and Metabolix companies see the future in cellulosics such as grasses and non-edible plant parts.

    "Crops like sugar cane and switchgrass have the potential to grow in acres where crops can't be grown or those grown are of marginal value," Peoples said.

    "It really allows you to produce bio-based, bio-degradeable materials from agriculture without impacting food."

    Davies also champions cellulosics: "If you look at our 140,000 tons at full capacity, we would use less than a tenth of the percent of the U.S. corn. We'll get big by getting more competitive in pricing, which means moving to cellulosics."

    Persuading critics

    Even at competitive cost, bioplastics companies must persuade critics and those confused about how environmentally friendly the different kinds of bio-plastics really are.

    "People don't like to deal with complexity. And the answers to all these questions is often: 'it depends'," Reid Lifset, an associate research scholar at Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Industrial Ecology, told CNN.

    Natureworks' PLAs can be chemically composted into lactic acid and then produce virgin polymer for new products -- yet the composting is still on a post-industrial scale and not widely available for ordinary households.

    Metabolix produces a different type, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), which Peoples said will readily bio-degrade in home composting and even in cold oceans.

    Lack of composting facilities could push bioplastics into landfills, where certain types would release more damaging methane than traditional PET plastics. Worries that bio-plastics could contaminate the PET recycling stream has some retailers hesitating.

    The impact also depends on other difficult variables, including each product's lifespan.

    Market growth, stricter government standards for plastics and limits on land filling are encouraging more research into improvements and solutions, but bio-plastics will not be a miracle cure in an "either-or" scenario with oil-based plastics, producers and experts say.

    "PET recycling is already very good. Our attitude is that Mirel should be used where it actually makes good sense and not to replace something where there already is a good system," said Peoples.

    Said Davies: "Bio-plastics can go somewhere at the end of their life, there are many exciting options for the future,"

    "Infrastructure will need to broaden to realize that, but that needn't be an impediment for people to use the plastics today."

  • 14-Dec-09 17:28 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Call for Papers: Sustainable Communities with - not despite - Industry: Industrial Symbiosis & Eco-industrial Development / Networking

    The 16th Annual
    International Sustainable Development Research Conference
    Hong Kong, 30 May – 1 June, 2010
    www.kadinst.hku.hk/sdconf10/indexin.html

    “A New Agenda for Global Governance”

    Track: Sustainable communities with - not despite - industry: industrial symbiosis & eco-industrial development / networking

    Chaired by:
    Abhishek Agarwal, Aberdeen Business School, The Robert Gordon University, UK: a.agarwal@rgu.ac.uk
    Ms Tracy Casavant, President, Eco-Industrial Solutions, Canada: tracy@ecoindustrial.ca
    Professor Yong Un Ban, Chungbuk National University, Korea: byubyu@cbu.ac.kr
    Professor Geng Yong, Chair Professor on Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China: gengyong@iae.ac.cn

    Overview

    The last two decades have seen an ever increasing interest in Industrial Symbiosis (IS) / Eco-industrial Development (EID) / Eco-industrial Networking (EIN) by policy makers, industry leaders and academics alike. This has led to the implementation of IS programmes and development of eco-industrial parks / networks in many countries.

    In attempting to encourage the adoption of industrial ecology (IE) principles such planned initiatives by Government have been supported by the use of a range of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments, with many reported corporate and environmental success stories to date. In addition to government policy and programmes, multi-stakeholder efforts have played a key role in the development of IS/EID/EIN initiatives. This provides a rich area of research, especially in examining the performance of such policy instruments, cross-sectoral partnerships and governance around IS/EID/EIN initiatives, and associated corporate strategies and programmes utilised by the international business community in contributing to broader Sustainable Development aspirations.

    This Track seeks to attract high quality papers which aim to be both critical and reflective of recent IS/EID/EIN projects and policy initiatives around the globe. This is important for those of us who are keen to see IE/IS as a meaningful concept in the pursuit of sustainability rather than merely a public relations exercise for Government, Facilitators and Corporate Actors. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, either in full or developmental form, in the following areas:
    • Government Policy and Programmes to promote IS/EID/EIN:
    - The Performance of New Environmental Policy Instruments e.g. Regulation, Market-based Instruments, and Voluntary Codes of Conduct
    - Government involvement in promoting IS/EID/EIN initiatives
    - Government-supported education and outreach
    - Development of Performance Evaluation Indicators for Eco-industrial Parks/Networks
    • Regional multi-stakeholder efforts to promote industrial sustainability
    - Cross-sectoral partnerships and governance for IS/EID/EIN
    - Regional government and other stakeholders’ role in the development of IS/EID/EIN initiatives
    - Role of facilitators in IS/EID/EIN initiatives and success of the facilitation process
    - Planning and development of eco-industrial parks / networks; land use planning
    - Transformation of existing industrial parks into eco-industrial parks
    - Transferability of IS/EID/EIN successful practices from one context (place) to another
    • Cases from industry sectors / corporate actors
    - IS/EID/EIN success/failure (case studies)
    - The impact of IS/EID/EIN initiatives on Corporate / Environmental Performance and regional sustainability
    - Reducing ecological / carbon / water footprint using IS/EID/EIN
    • Tools and Techniques of IE/IS e.g. internet based resource / by-products matching system
    • Evaluation tools and techniques for IS/EID/EIN projects, including environmental impact assessment and life cycle assessment

    When submitting your abstract, please categorise it as TRACK “Sustainable communities with - not despite - industry: industrial symbiosis & eco-industrial development / networking” and THEME "Industrial symbiosis, eco-industrial parks and eco-industrial networking and regional sustainability"

    Detailed information and link about how to submit an abstract is available at:
    http://www.kadinst.hku.hk/sdconf10/abstract_submission.html

    In addition to submitting abstract online, please send a copy of abstract by email to a.agarwal@rgu.ac.uk

    Deadline for submitting abstracts: December 31, 2009

    For further information please contact:
    Abhishek Agarwal, Email: a.agarwal@rgu.ac.uk
  • 11-Dec-09 15:05 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)

    Click here for full article

    While not on the front line 
of climate solutions, recycling of waste materials, wastewater, and wasted energy is a locally available and highly desirable means of reducing greenhouse gases. One potent greenhouse gas, the methane emitted from landfills and wastewater, accounts for about 90 per cent of greenhouse gas emissions from the entire waste sector. That amount is 18 per cent of human-caused methane emissions globally and about three per cent of total greenhouse gases, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.1 Diverting waste bound for landfills and putting it to good use, then, is an obvious and proven means for conserving land and resources, as we have known for a long time; we can now add the knowledge from numerous studies that these practices also bolster climate protection.

    This article draws on examples from around the world to describe the climate effects of 1) household recycling and reuse, 2) the cyclic resource flows across clusters of companies known as “industrial symbiosis”, and 3) far reaching policy proposals for national scale resource use. It draws lessons from the system’s perspective provided by industrial ecology, a new field resolutely focused on the flows of material, energy, and water through systems at different scales, from products to factories to countries and regions.

    How does resource reuse affect climate? Cycling energy through cogeneration, reuse of agricultural wastes, or recovery of energy-intensive materials such as aluminium, reduces greenhouse gases. Since most commercial energy is produced from burning fossil fuels, the power generation sector emits more greenhouse gases than any other industrial sector. Cycling materials for use in other production processes reduces the lifecycle impacts, when compared with virgin materials that must be extracted from the earth and then transformed and transported through numerous stages. Recovered resources free up land and capital for other opportunities that would have been required for the equivalent amount of goods to be made from virgin resources. Cycling water means using it more than once, a critical and increasingly urgent practice where water is scarce owing to expected changes in precipitation patterns brought on by climate change. To capture these concepts, industrial ecologists use the term “embedded utility”: the total amount of the water, energy, and materials used for all different lifecycle stages of a product from beginning to end.2 Embedded utility is central to industrial ecology: if a product is landfilled, these resources are lost.

    Household Waste and Recycling
    Study after study in the last five years from Brazil to Canada and from Europe to Asia affirms the ability to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from household waste on a lifecycle basis. Each of these lifecycle studies finds a clear, positive impact of recycling and reuse on reducing greenhouse gasses, principally because of recapturing, rather than discarding, the embedded energy, water, and materials used to make the products in the first place. These studies have included “upstream” (production stage) impacts, such as the effect of replacing virgin materials with recycled ones, as well as “downstream” (waste management) impacts that result from alternative strategies such as landfilling, incineration, composting and recycling. The sum of upstream and downstream amount to a dual benefit from recycling. Even when the emissions from collection trucks and additional transport to recycling facilities are included, greenhouse gas savings prevail.

    The scale and mechanism of greenhouse gas reductions for a particular location, however, depend on the specific materials involved, the extent of recovery, the availability of markets, and the mix of fuels avoided through recycling of resources. Recycling metals carries a large energy benefit, while paper recycling often contributes to forest carbon sequestration benefits. Replacing power generated by oil or coal, two carbon-intensive fuel sources, adds more greenhouse gas benefits to recycling than replacing power generated from renewables or hydro energy. Thus, there are no universal claims, but significant regional differences occur when measuring comparative climate impacts from waste recycling and disposal.

    There are now many tools to calculate greenhouse gas impacts of different solid waste management options and materials. One example is the Environmental Benefits Calculator of the Northeast Recycling Council in the United Sates, which estimates the environmental benefits of a selected study area based on the tonnages of materials that are source reduced, reused, recycled, landfilled, or incinerated. The Calculator, a Microsoft Excel-based tool, incorporates findings from several lifecycle studies based on “typical” facilities and operating characteristics in the United States.3 The Brazil study measured in detail the greenhouse gas impacts of individual materials, including aluminium, plastic, paper, steel and glass.4

    With some exceptions for mixed or contaminated materials that are difficult to categorize or recycle, a broad array of policy programmes is available to reduce climate-related impacts of waste management. Some of the most successful programmes include recycling pick-up from homes or drop-off at district centres; requiring residents who generate a lot of waste to pay more than those who generate less (“pay as you throw”); instituting policies that originated in Europe and are diffusing quickly in Asia that require producers of goods to play a larger role in taking back products (extended producer responsibility); and assessing fees and taxes on categories of goods such as tyres or batteries, or on landfill use overall.

    Industrial Symbiosis
    While geographic concentrations of industry are often heavy generators of greenhouse gases associated with global climate change, impacts can be modulated through collaborative approaches. Emerging from industrial ecology is the notion of “industrial symbiosis”: where a cluster of geographically proximate companies exchange material by-products, energy, and water in a mutually beneficial manner, such that waste from one industrial process becomes the feedstock for another. Through such systems, transportation costs and emissions are minimized and embedded utility is conserved, enabling greenhouse gas emissions to be greatly reduced at the industrial scale.

    A simple but prevalent reuse of an industrial by-product is fly ash from coal plants used to make concrete. A British expert estimated that there were 600 million tonnes of coal ash worldwide in 2000.5 For each tonne of fly ash that is substituted for Portland cement to make concrete, the dual benefit is realized: not only is a tonne of material being diverted from landfill downstream, but assuming reasonable transportation distances, close to one tonne of carbon dioxide is also avoided upstream.6 Still, using the United States as an example, over 50 per cent of coal fly ash winds up in landfills.7

    At the level of an industrial district, there are numerous cases of multi-firm exchanges of process by-products. The most famous of these includes over 20 exchanges across eight member companies and many other ancillary operations in Kalundborg, Denmark. The primary partners in Kalundborg include an oil refinery, a power station, a gypsum board facility, a pharmaceutical plant, and an enzyme manufacturer. They share ground water, surface water, wastewater, steam, and fuel, and also exchange a variety of by-products such as coal ash and synthetic gypsum that become feedstock in other processes.8

    An even larger example is in Tianjin, China where over 80 exchanges of materials, energy, and water across companies have been identified at the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA), which hosts some 60 international Fortune 500 companies.9 Preliminary analysis at TEDA indicates substantial greenhouse gas reduction from process energy recovery and energy cascading (such as condensate recycling), significant water reuse, and savings in transport, given the shorter distances these materials travel in and around a region rather than being shipped in from more distant areas. Staff of the National Industrial Symbiosis Program (NISP) funded by the British Government routinely use publicly available conversion factors to assess the greenhouse gas impacts of every industrial exchange they broker across parties. In the last four years, NISP reports having diverted over five million tonnes of waste from landfill, saved nearly eight million tonnes of virgin material from use in the United Kingdom, while eliminating over five million tonnes of carbon emissions throughout its industrial network.10

    Far-Reaching National Policy Proposals
    Given the benefits to the climate of source reduction, reuse, and recycling over other waste options, it is not surprising that some Governments have been interested in implementing these practices on a national basis. Germany and Japan are credited with the earliest legislation to encourage more recycling-oriented societies. In 1994, Germany passed the “Act for Promoting Closed Substance Cycle Waste Management and Ensuring Environmentally Compatible Waste Disposal” with the explicit goal of conserving natural resources and providing for sound waste disposal.11 In 2000, Japan enacted the “Basic Act for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society” and in 2003, established the “Fundamental Plan for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society”, seeking reductions in waste disposal and increases in jobs in businesses related to promoting recycling and the sound material-cycle society. Japan has taken this logic to the international community through its “3R Initiative” to urge waste policy based on the 3Rs of “reduce, reuse, recycle” that was agreed to at the G8 Summit of 2004.

    Most recently, China enacted, as of 1 January 2009, “The Circular Economy Promotion Law” a progressive and far-reaching policy based on the need to balance China’s rapid economic growth with the realities of a deteriorating environment. The “circular economy” is defined comprehensively in the law referring to the reduction, reuse and recycling of resources during the processes of production, circulation and consumption.

    Discussion
    It is important to keep in perspective that while climate-related impacts of waste management are significant, many other waste-related issues must also be addressed, from air pollution, to water quality at waste management sites, to land degradation and resource scarcity. In the least developed countries where waste scavenging is prevalent, often in highly organized pods of the informal economy, numerous social, economic, and public health issues accompany waste management decision-making. Still, climate impacts in the waste sector are projected to rise by another 20 per cent by 2030, according to a study by McKinsey & Company. On the reduction side, a full 60 per cent of the potential to abate these increases could be achieved through recycling.13

    Historically, increases in waste generation have had a clear statistical relationship with gross domestic product per capita: the stronger the economy, the more waste. Yet some countries have successfully decoupled economic growth from waste. Even with more income, less landfilling means more source reduction, reuse, and recycling which, in turn, reduces climate impact. Early studies about “green jobs” indicate that recycling and composting create much more employment than disposal, providing opportunities for training, employment, and new investment in next-generation waste technologies. Cascading benefits from technology and innovation for conserving and reusing materials, water, and energy are growing and are likely to make an enormous difference in decreasing climate impacts from waste.
     

    Notes

    1 Bogner, J.E., 2007. “Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation)” Waste Management & Research, 26 (1), pp 11-32.
    2 Graedel, T. E and Allenby,B. Industrial Ecology, 2nd Edition: (New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 2002)
    3 See: http://www.nerc.org/documents/environmental_benefits_calculator.html#whatinfo
    4 Pimenteira, C., 2004, “Energy conservation and CO2 emission reductions due to recycling in Brazil”, Waste Management, 24 (9), pp 889-897.
    5 Tenenbaum, D.J., 2007. “Recycling: Building on Fly Ash Waste”, Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 115, no. 1, Jan 01.
    For comparison, 600 million tons is approximately twice the amount of municipal solid waste generated in the US every year according to US EPA.
    6 O’Brien, K. et al, 2009, “Case Study Reducing GHG Emissions from the Concrete Industry”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment; Springer.
    7 American Coal Ash Association, 2008, 2007 Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Production & Use Survey Results (Revised), September 2009.
    8 Symbiosis Institute, Kalundborg, Denmark, www.symbiosis.dk
    9 Shi, H. and M. Chertow, 2009. “Developing Country Experience in Eco-Industrial Parks: a Case Study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China.” Working paper. Yale Center for Industrial Ecology.
    10 National Industrial Symbiosis Programme, http://www.nisp.org.uk/
    11 “Kreislaufwirtschafts–und Abfallgesetz–KrW-/AbfG.” Federal Law Gazette (BGBl) I 1994, 2705
    12 The Basic Act for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society, Act No.110 of 2000, Japan. This is sometimes translated into English as the “Recycling-Based Society.”
    13 McKinsey & Company, 2009, Pathways to a Low-Carbon Economy.

  • 03-Dec-09 14:32 | Melanie Quigley (administrator)
    Click here for full article.

    MYSORE: Concerned over the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, Karnataka State Pollution Control Board chairman A
    Sadashivaiah on Thursday called upon industrialists to reduce carbon di-oxide emissions by adopting latest technologies.

    Speaking after inaugurating an awareness programme on the industrial ecology and eco-industrial networking, organized as part of the National Pollution Prevention Day, he said solid wastes from industries have to be managed well to contain the emissions and thwart dangers of climate change.

    The days of pipeline treatment for industrial waste are over and now, industries across the globe are looking for efficient use of resources and disposal of the waste, which is unaffordable to treat if not eliminated at the source level. The concept of industrial ecology takes a systematic approach in understanding the sustainability of materials, energy and waste flows within the system. It offers guidelines for improving efficiency and effectiveness of resource management thus addressing the environmental concerns, Sadashivaiah added.

    It is exactly 25 years since the Union Carbide disaster in Bhopal, which shook the world. The day is obseved to mark its anniversary.

    Sadashivaiah claimed that Najangud is one of the developed industrial towns in Karnataka, which has sugar, distilleries, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, electronics, paper and pulp, textiles, instant coffee, engineering, automobile and granite units. Keeping in view close proximity of river Kabini, the board has advised industries to take preventive measures to prevent any danger.

    He said he has instructed the Mysore regional KSPCB authorities to conduct a survey among the industries falling under its jurisdiction and promote planting of saplings among industrialists. "The forest department is ready to supply the saplings," he said.

    Weslynne Ashton of the Centre for Industrial Ecology, Yale University, USA, presented a paper on introduction to industrial ecology and international best practices on application of industrial ecology in business and resource optimization initiative.

    Representatives attached to different industries from Nanjangud participated in the programme at the Regional Museum of Natural History. Senior environmental officer S Nanda Kumar and environmental officer Prakash were present.



    Twitter Facebook Share Print Email Save Comment
 

International Society for Industrial Ecology | Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies | 195 Prospect St. New Haven Connecticut 06511 USA | Contact us at 203.432.6953 or email is4ie@yale.edu